Example data Environment & Land Preservation Neglectedness 4/10 · Somewhat overlooked (example)

Example: Creekside Water Monitors

Citizen scientists sampling small streams every month.

Photo placeholder A volunteer in waders filling a sample jar A fictional monthly sampling run.

The story

Small streams change faster than agencies can check them. Volunteers sample the same sites every month, so a sudden change shows up quickly.

The data go on a public map, which has already helped one town trace a pollution source.

The team

  • Hollis Grant · Program manager
  • Imani Brooks · Lab technician
  • Frank Delgado · Volunteer trainer

Example team (fictional people, for illustration only).

Efficiency rating

D Source: Example data - not sourced, as of

64¢ of every $1 reaches the work
  • Reaches the work: 64¢
  • Overhead: 22¢
  • Advertising: 8¢
  • Executive pay: 6¢
Where each dollar goes Where each dollar goes: 64¢ reaches the work, 22¢ overhead, 8¢ advertising, 6¢ executive pay. 64¢ reaches the work
  • Reaches the work: 64¢
  • Overhead: 22¢
  • Advertising: 8¢
  • Executive pay: 6¢
Show data table
Where each dollar goes (Example data)
CategoryCents per $1
Reaches the work64
Overhead22
Advertising8
Executive pay6

How the work budget is spent (example data)

How the work budget is spent How the work budget is spent: 58% monthly program costs, 24% materials, 10% training and safety, 8% reporting.
Monthly program costs
58%
Materials
24%
Training and safety
10%
Reporting
8%
Monthly donors
35
Cost per stream site per month
$30
Location
Example Valley

About this project

A fictional watershed group that pays for test kits and lab fees so volunteers can sample stream sites on a monthly schedule and publish the results. Placeholder text only.

Impact / Why it matters

Regular local sampling spots pollution early and builds a record that agencies can rely on.

Small streams are rarely monitored, so problems such as runoff or a failing septic system can go unnoticed until fish disappear or the water smells wrong. Official sampling is too thin to catch everything.

Trained volunteers sampling the same sites every month create a long, consistent record. Changes stand out, and the evidence is detailed enough to take to officials or to guide cleanup work.

Taking part also helps people feel connected to their local waterways and gives them a reason to look after them.

Stream sites delivered per quarter Stream sites delivered per quarter: Q2 2025 9, Q3 2025 13, Q4 2025 17, Q1 2026 18, Q2 2026 22. 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 Q2 2025: 9 stream sites Q2 2025 Q3 2025: 13 stream sites Q3 2025 Q4 2025: 17 stream sites Q4 2025 Q1 2026: 18 stream sites Q1 2026 Q2 2026: 22 stream sites Q2 2026

Stream sites delivered per quarter (example data, in stream sites)

Show data table
Stream sites delivered per quarter (example data)
Quarterstream sites
Q2 20259
Q3 202513
Q4 202517
Q1 202618
Q2 202622

Project updates

Example updates: fictional news for illustration. Newest first.

  1. October samples collected

    Thirty-one sites were sampled by 22 volunteers in a single weekend.

  2. Pollution source traced

    Monthly readings pointed to a leaking tank upstream, which the owner has since repaired.

Example data. This project and its figures are fictional placeholders. See the methodology for how real ratings will be sourced.